“A Young Doctor’s Notebook” by Mikhail Bulgakov is a goldmine of information for those interested in the history of medicine.
Mikhail Bulgakov, a Russian doctor and writer, lived from 1891 to 1940. Born into a family of intellectuals, he studied medicine in Kiev, graduating in 1916. He then worked in various rural villages, with his first experience in Smolensk, Russia, proving particularly formative. Many events narrated in “A Young Doctor’s Notebook” stem from this experience.
After contracting typhus during his medical work, Bulgakov gradually abandoned the profession to dedicate himself to writing. Among his notable works is “The Master and Margarita,” widely regarded as his masterpiece. He died in Moscow in 1940 and is now considered one of the greatest Russian writers.
In “A Young Doctor’s Notebook,” Bulgakov recounts the experiences of a young physician sent to a remote village in rural Russia shortly after the 1917 revolution. The work offers numerous accounts of the state of medicine in rural Russia during this period of profound social transformation.
The young, inexperienced doctor finds himself isolated. He has no nearby medical facilities for referrals, no seasoned colleagues to seek advice from and no possibility of specialist consultations.
This isolation, characteristic of rural doctors, subjected the young physician to constant pressure and challenges. He faced a lack of support and feared confronting difficult situations without the necessary experience.
“I found myself completely alone, a newly graduated doctor, with only four years of theory behind me, thrown into a hole, without the possibility of receiving advice from anyone.”
Lack of resources
The medical facilities lacked adequate diagnostic tools, even those limited ones available at the time. Medicines were scarce, a situation exacerbated by the post-revolutionary period’s disorganization. This situation led to a profound sense of frustration in the young doctor.
For instance, when faced with performing an emergency tracheotomy, he discovers he lacks the proper tools:
“I lacked the necessary instruments. I didn’t have a complete tracheotomy set. The knife I found was barely suitable and I felt like a butcher.”
Theoretical Knowledge vs. Practical Experience
The transition from theoretical knowledge gained in university to the demanding realities of clinical practice is a common challenge for doctors across different eras and locations. This gap between theory and practice often creates a sense of inadequacy. For the protagonist, this feeling is particularly acute due to his isolation and lack of resources—conditions that intensify the struggle faced by many young physicians.
A striking example occurs when the young doctor faces the daunting task of performing an amputation:
“There was a mountain of muscles, arteries, veins, and everything was moving. The textbook hadn’t prepared me for this. Muscles had never been part of my exam.”
Hygienic and Sanitary Conditions
The protagonist encounters deplorable hygienic and sanitary conditions among the rural population. Infectious diseases run rampant, and patients lack awareness of even the most basic hygiene practices.
“The woman presented herself with mud-caked feet, a filthy scarf on her head, and obvious signs of syphilis. She had no idea what hygiene was. She had never seen a doctor before.”
Medical Progress
Despite adverse conditions and limited resources, the young doctor recognizes significant advancements in his field. He consistently strives to maintain a scientific approach in his practice. When successfully employing a remarkable new technique during a challenging childbirth, he experiences joy and appreciation for the progress he witnesses firsthand.
“Thanks to chloroform, the operation was successful. It was the first time I had used an anesthetic, and it seemed incredible to be able to operate without causing pain.”
The pathologies encountered by the young doctor offer insight into the diseases prevalent in rural areas during the early 20th century.
Syphilis
Syphilis was one of the most common conditions treated by the young doctor. This sexually transmitted disease was rampant among the poorest social classes. It manifested through skin lesions (ulcers or eruptions) and systemic symptoms. Patients often sought medical attention only at an advanced stage. Since antibiotics hadn’t been invented yet, treatment relied on mercury or Salvarsan—a chemotherapeutic drug introduced in 1910.
“Every patient with signs of syphilis was terrified by the word ‘Salvarsan,’ refused to follow my prescriptions, and preferred to rely on folk medicine remedies.”
Diphtheria
Diphtheria was even more feared than syphilis, primarily because it affected children. High fever and breathing difficulties raised suspicions of the disease, with diagnosis confirmed by the presence of grayish membranes in the throat.
Though antitoxin serums had been introduced by this time, they were rarely available in rural areas. The only life-saving remedy, therefore, remained emergency tracheotomy.
“I’d never performed a tracheotomy before, but I had no choice. The child was suffocating.”
Typhus
Typhus was another prevalent infectious disease in rural populations, exacerbated by poor hygiene. It presented with fever, abdominal pain, and diarrhea, accompanied by a distinctive rash. Before the advent of antibiotics, no effective cure existed. Doctors could only offer supportive care, focusing on hydration and fever management.
“The hygienic conditions in the village were terrible, and each winter brought new waves of typhus.”
Complicated Childbirth
In that era, doctors could only identify a complicated childbirth through prolonged labor and the fetus’s abnormal position. Modern monitoring systems were nonexistent. Manual techniques proved largely ineffective, often necessitating the use of forceps to perform an assisted delivery. Inoltre non c’era l’anestesia e quindi questi interventi erano molto dolorosi. Additionally, the absence of anesthesia meant these procedures were excruciatingly painful.
“My hands were trembling as I tried to apply the forceps. It felt like I was holding not just a baby, but life itself in my hands, and I could only pray that everything would go well.”
Wounds and Injuries
Farm work frequently led to wounds or injuries, which occasionally resulted from violent incidents as well. The doctor’s treatment involved suturing, placing drains, and cleansing with antiseptics—primarily iodine and alcohol—to ward off infections.
“I had no means to prevent infection. I could only clean the wound as best as possible and hope it wouldn’t worsen.”
A central aspect of Bulgakov’s narrative is the contrast between theoretical training and practical reality, particularly in the rural and ill-equipped setting where he began his medical career.
The young doctor immediately perceives the stark contrast between his theoretical training and the practical realities of rural medicine, causing him considerable anxiety:
“I had studied the manuals, I had passed the exams, but nothing had prepared me for what I found here. The human body didn’t seem to be the same as described in my textbooks.”
This contrast between theory and practice breeds a sense of inadequacy, manifesting as intense anxiety and fear when confronting complex emergencies. Furthermore, the weight of responsibility is immense, as the doctor realizes that a patient’s life hangs in the balance of their every decision and action.
“My hands were trembling. I had never seen anything like it, let alone done it. But I couldn’t back down. The patient’s life was in my hands.”
Finally, there’s the realization that beyond the gap between theory and practice lies a reality surpassing what was taught. The young doctor encounters situations never addressed during his studies, forcing him to confront unforeseen challenges.
“The book said everything would go smoothly, but reality bore no resemblance to anything I had studied. The childbirth wasn’t proceeding as expected, and I felt lost.”
Despite this abyss of inadequacy, anxiety, and terror, the doctor summons the strength to resolve situations—inventing, adapting, and improvising.
“There was no time for doubt. I had to act. I took the scalpel and made the incision. I had never done it before, but I had no choice.”
Through facing novel and unforeseen situations, the doctor gradually builds confidence and skills. Learning on the job—with both successes and failures—he gains practical competence that his studies hadn’t provided. This hands-on experience, filled with trials and errors, proves invaluable in developing abilities beyond what textbooks could offer.
“After each procedure, I felt a new awareness growing within me. Every mistake, every success taught me something that no book had ever taught me.”
A final aspect worth exploring in Bulgakov’s text is the doctor’s relationship with patients and the broader community. The villagers’ shifting attitudes, their expectations, and their tendency to glorify successes while assigning blame for failures remain surprisingly relevant today. This dynamic between medical professionals and the public they serve continues to be a complex and often challenging aspect of healthcare.
Initially, when the young doctor arrives in the village, he is viewed with admiration. The villagers see him as an authoritative figure capable of curing diseases and solving problems. To them, he represents not only a bearer of scientific and modern knowledge but also a sort of possessor of esoteric powers.
“They looked at me and my bag with a sort of veneration. I was the first doctor they had ever seen in the flesh, and to them, I was a magical figure.”
However, as treatments fail to yield immediate results and his prescriptions stray from popular beliefs, the villagers’ initial admiration swiftly morphs into distrust and suspicion.
“Despite my best intentions, they continued to believe that their folk remedies were more effective than my medicines. They often looked at me with suspicion, as if they didn’t really trust what I was doing.”
Beyond the aspects we’ve already discussed, the doctor faces an additional source of anxiety: the knowledge that a single mistake or failure could irreparably damage his reputation. For instance, following a challenging delivery resulting in the infant’s death, the community’s regard for the doctor drop dramatically.
“After the baby’s death, I felt they looked at me differently. I was no longer the promising young doctor who would solve every problem. Now I was simply another fallible man.”
The villagers clung to their folk remedies and superstitions, often viewing the doctor’s modern treatments with suspicion and fear. This realization led the young physician to understand that his role extended beyond merely treating patients—he needed to educate them as well.
“When I prescribed a medication, they often refused it, preferring to rely on a spell or an ointment passed down from their ancestors.”
However, trust and confidence can be as quickly regained as they were lost, following a successful intervention and a patient’s recovery.
“After the operation, they looked at me as if I were a living miracle. I had brought someone back to life whom they had already given up for dead. For the first time, I felt the weight of my power.”
The relationship between doctors and patients in Russian rural villages continues to be characterized by a complex and ever-shifting dynamic in the modern era. This fluctuation in sentiment ranges from eager anticipation and hopeful expectations to skepticism and wariness, and from adulation and reverence to criticism and disdain. Such dramatic swings in public opinion don’t necessarily reflect the actual quality of medical care provided. Rather, they’re often influenced by the inherently unpredictable nature of medical outcomes, the varying experiences of individual patients, and broader societal perceptions of healthcare.
Mikhail Bulgakov, one of the most prominent and influential Russian writers of the 20th century, relied extensively from his medical background in composing his literary works. His experiences as a physician not only shaped his worldview but also provided a rich source of material for his writing. This is particularly evident in his collection of medical stories, most notably A Young Doctor’s Notebook, where Bulgakov probes deep into the complex nature of the medical profession.
In these narratives, Bulgakov explores the intricate human aspects of practicing medicine. He portrays the psychological struggles faced by medical professionals, from the overwhelming sense of responsibility to the constant battle against self-doubt. The moral dilemmas encountered in the field are exposed, offering readers a window into the complex decision-making processes that doctors must navigate daily. Furthermore, Bulgakov’s work sheds light on the nuanced and often challenging relationship between doctors and their patients, revealing the delicate balance of trust, authority, and vulnerability that characterizes these interactions.
Beyond the personal and interpersonal aspects, Bulgakov’s medical stories serve as a valuable historical document. They provide readers with a meticulously detailed and insightful portrayal of healthcare management in rural Russia at the turn of the 20th century. Through his vivid descriptions and astute observations, Bulgakov paints a picture of a medical landscape contending with limited resources, widespread superstitions, and the gradual introduction of modern medical practices. This unique perspective offers not only a window into the past but also a point of reflection on the evolution of medical care and its ongoing challenges.
Images from Wikimedia Commons